SuperCompress

Comparison · Updated 2026-11-08

SuperCompress vs Caveman

Caveman v4 is a local package that combines terse replies with input compression and other agent optimizations. Its standalone skill changes reply style. SuperCompress is a hosted service that selects original context lines against the current question. Compare local deployment, feature scope, evidence retention and total task cost; both full packages can affect input tokens.

Side by side

CavemanSuperCompress
What it optimizesReplies and input context in v4; skill-only mode changes repliesInput context (tool output, logs, files, MCP results, RAG)
How it decidesLocal feature bundle; terse reply style in skill-only modeQuery-aware extraction of original lines
Where it runsLocal CLI/proxy; standalone skill also availableHosted API, plus an MCP tool and hooks for coding agents
Setupnpx @caveman-ai/cli@latest, or install the skill alonenpm install -g supercompress-proxy && supercompress setup
LicenceOpen sourceHosted service

Caveman

A. Caveman

Choose the full package for local input compression and terse replies, or the standalone skill for a style change.

Caveman v4 combines a terse-output skill with local input compression, model/effort selection and other agent features. The repository documents per-feature controls. Older tests of the reply skill do not measure the whole current package.

Strengths:

Limitations:

SuperCompress

B. SuperCompress (our product)

Best if your agent keeps pulling big tool results, logs or retrieved docs and only a few lines matter for the question at hand, and you want those lines kept verbatim.

Hosted, query-aware context compression. Your agent or app sends a bulky block (tool output, a log, a diff, a file read, an MCP result, retrieved docs) with the current question, and the hosted Neural Keep model keeps the original lines that answer it, word for word, and drops the rest.

Strengths:

Limitations:

How to test any of these fairly

Every tool here, including ours, publishes its own numbers. Fewer tokens do not always mean a smaller bill once prompt caching, retries and extra agent turns are counted. Run the same tasks with and without a tool, check the tasks still succeed, and compare cost per finished task on your provider bill.

Disclosure: SuperCompress publishes this page and is listed first because it is ours. Every claim about other tools comes from their own docs or repositories as of 2026-10-31; tell us if anything is out of date and we will fix it.

See also: Caveman alternatives, all comparisons.

FAQ

Is SuperCompress better than Caveman?

The full packages overlap on input compression, but differ in deployment and feature scope. Choose the full package for local input compression and terse replies, or the standalone skill for a style change. Best if your agent keeps pulling big tool results, logs or retrieved docs and only a few lines matter for the question at hand, and you want those lines kept verbatim.

What is the main difference between SuperCompress and Caveman?

Caveman v4 runs a local feature bundle that includes input compression and terse replies. SuperCompress offers hosted query-aware input extraction. The standalone Caveman skill addresses reply style only.

Can I use both?

Usually, if they act on different tokens. Measure cost per finished task with each on and off.

Get API key Coding agents guide All comparisons